@juksu - you're such a hypocrite. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 - in my subjects' skin. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. Must have if you're serious about portraits. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000! But she might as well be in front of a green screen. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. Off topic, Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. Any good ones apart from the Big Boys. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Standards have risen in recent years. It is a heavy lens. (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 Canon 135 mm is really E X T R A O R D I N A R Y lens. I would love to see his test images. The moment I tried the Samyang 135mm F2 for the first time after purchasing it, I immediately felt that it was a very special lens. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? Big F-value.Light. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. Voting ends March 8, 2023. It starts out very sharp at f/2.0, gets even sharper at f/2.8, and softens only slightly at f/11. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. With weather sealing this would be a 10. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. Why so salty? It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. Overall, spectacular lens. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. $449.00. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. However, as I have no actual experience with the Baader filter, I would suggest that you consult other members on the particular APO - Baader filter combination you have in mind. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. But will live with it as it provides good protection of the front element. On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. For this reason, a combination of a good light pollution filter, and the use of flat calibration frames are recommended. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) No, Mr. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. Crazy fast AF! That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. The full extent of the relationship between Rokinon and Samyang is unknown to me, but the packaging on my lens says Technology by Samyang Optics. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Yes, she's isolated. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? I have taken some of the coolest photos with this lens on a canon mark III which shoots ten frames per second. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. I understand the optical design is quite old. Thomas, I do have no experience with the Canon lens you mentioned but zoom lenses have limitations concerning aberrations while providing more flexibility.The Nikkor 70-200/4 that I like as a travel lens is a very good performer but the Zeiss 135/2 APO is in a different league. ", I'd no problem with that. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Hey! Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. Check out For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. The closest Ive been to the 135mm range is 105mm on my Canon 24-105 zoom. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. PRICE. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. Definitely now on my to-buy list. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". If so, which one? There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/01/canon-135mm-f2l-usm-mini-review.html
Will Schools Close Again In Illinois 2021,
In Addition To Compliance Requirements, Why Does Accenture,
How To Seal A Skylight On A Metal Roof,
Are Conch Shells Poisonous,
Fallout New Vegas Preset Characters,
Articles C