Geert Vanden Bossche is een Belgische dierenarts, viroloog en onafhankelijk onderzoeker en adviseur op het gebied van vaccins. De inhoud is, tenzij anders aangegeven, beschikbaar onder. Nirenberg goes further and notes that the antibody titers induced by vaccines are MUCH higher than those seen after infection, and we see hallmarks of memory responses induced by these vaccines from even a single dose, suggesting that, even though there is a decrease in neutralization by vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, that might not portend a loss in protection. Despite taking Vanden Bossches assertions extremely seriously, these high-profile alternative-media figures dont even do basic due diligence such as looking into McMillan, whos the man who interviewed Vanden Bossche, or the company McMillan is apparently affiliated with, Vejon Health. EnVanden Bossches alternatieve NK-vaccin bestaat nog niet. There you have it, the lone scientific maverick who is the only one willing to speak out about against a horror being perpetrated by conventional medicine and science that they dont want you to know about or discuss, a horror thats so urgent that he must speak now. Men draagt een verantwoordelijkheid. VRT journalist Vincent Merckx melde dat Vanden Bossche niet wou reageren, die informatie is dus vals. Volg VRT NWS op uw smartphone of tablet via de VRT NWS-app. And its true. Er bestaat geen bewijs dat de beweringen van Geert Vanden Bossche kan ondersteunen. Is Vanden Bossche fout met zijn theorie of is hij een kiezel in de schoen van de media en experten die het debat domineren omtrent de covid aanpak. De experten zitten op twitter fact-checkers te liken en roepen mij op aan de juiste kant te staan. Duitsland blokkeert goedkeuring, Auto rijdt binnen in huis in Mol, bestuurder pleegt vluchtmisdrijf. Vanden Bossche is bij het publiek bekend vanwege zijn kritiek op het coronabeleid van overheden. Indien zijn theorie klopt maar er was geen wetenschapper die daarvoor publiekelijk gewaarschuwd had zou dat door de media-experten nog kunnen zijn weggezet als schuld van de ongevaccineerden of als bewijs hoe ernstig het virus toch wel is en hoe belangrijk het was dat we al die maatregelen namen. He adds hes now focusing on vaccines that educate the immune system in ways that are to some extent more efficient than we do right now with our conventional vaccines. Clearly hes got significant conflicts of interest. 23.4K. So its not surprising that Dr. Vanden Bossches letter reminds me of Andrew Wakefields warning about the MMR vaccine. Over the last several months, Ive listed a number of examples of this phenomenon of antivaxxers recycling hoary tropes to apply them to COVID-19 vaccines; for example, claims that vaccines kill, cause infertility, cancer, autoimmune disorders, and Alzheimers disease, and are loaded with toxins, among several others, such as the claim that they alter your DNA. Even if it were evolving resistance, once again, the answer would be to reformulate the vaccine in order to include the altered antigens, the same conclusion made when considering the possibility that B. pertussis was evolving resistance or that evolutionary drift was leading to the predominance of strains not covered by the vaccine. This problem will be exacerbated, he claims, because people who have been vaccinated (and/or social distancing and staying inside during the pandemic) will be less capable of fighting off those strains than someone who has not been vaccinated. | Voice for Science and. If you havent, its new to you. I noted then that there was no evidence that mass vaccination with MMR had produced variants of the measles vaccine resistant to the immunity produced by the vaccine, just as I note now that there is as yet no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 variants are resistant to the immunity produced by current COVID-19 vaccines. (6/7) When presenting with first signs & symptoms, ALL MUST have free access to immune-strengthening supplements (mostly sufficient for the young & previously healthy) and early multidrug treatment (mostly required for the vulnerable & elderly). We'll try to work on further translations and regular updates. Integendeel zelfs. His argument sounds a lot like an argument Andrew Wakefield once made for MMR. While Vanden Bossche's ideas may be rooted in actual scientific concepts, his argument quite explicitly relies on sweeping assumptions. Integendeel, de uitbraken zijn onder controle gebracht.. ), vertelde Vanden Bossche tijdens een congres in Ohio begin deze maand. Vanden Bossche presented his ideas to the public in a series of open letters or powerpoint presentations on his personal website. Ik ben onafhankelijk en neutraal, heb geen aandelen bij vaccin fabrikanten en ben niet gebonden aan contracten die bepalen wat ik al dan niet mag zeggen. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but dont seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Come to think of it, the similarities between Dr. Vanden Bossche and Andrew Wakefield strike me as stronger than ever now, given that, as well documented by Brian Deer, Wakefield basically published his fraudulent science to support the claim that the MMR vaccine causes autism in order to make a market for his own single vaccine against the measles. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. Its a rationale for developing reformulated booster vaccines that cover variants not well covered by the currently-used COVID-19 vaccines. This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. Der Urheber der These ist der Belgier Geert Vanden Bossche, der in den Berichten als Impfexperte" oder anerkannter Top-Virologe" bezeichnet wird. Je laten vaccineren lijkt wel het nieuwe dopen. CC BY-NC-ND 2.0. Waar is de vrouwelijke kant van de oorlog? Very interested in spirituality. Whats particularly dangerous about Dr. Vanden Bossches misinformation is that, on the surface, he appears to be a vaccine expert, whom antivaxxers touting his open letter (and all the follow-up science hes been Tweeting and posting to his website) have been describing as a worlds expert in vaccines. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. Nu is het een ander verhaal. Leroux-Roels duikt tijdens ons gesprek in de databank clinicaltrials.com, waar alle wetenschappelijke studies geregistreerd worden. If you claim to be not antivaccine but your message is so attractive to a rabid antivaxxer and leader of the antivaccine movement like Del Bigtree that he spends an hour promoting it, you are either deluding yourself about being not antivaccine, or youre a useful idiot for the antivaccine movement, possibly both. This material may not be reproduced without permission. As any chicken farmer knows (or any veterinarian like Dr. Vanden Bossche should know), vaccinating against Mareks disease has population health benefits in that it prevents mass death due to the disease, even if the vaccine can allow more virulent strains to evolve. [1] In 2018 he was elected president of the Society of International Economic Law (SIEL). Again, this is an argument antivaxxers have made dating back at least to the pertussis vaccine. Vanden Bossche's scientific argument in broad terms is that the current COVID-19 vaccines, through a mechanism analogous to antibiotic resistance, will create mutant variants of the virus that escape the protection of those vaccines. If there emerge SARS-CoV-2 variants that are less susceptible to the immunity produced by COVID-19 vaccines, the answer is to reformulate the vaccines! Why? Clearly, variability in the spike glycoprotein can affect the efficiency of antibody neutralisation. Als de dosis die je van antibiotica neemt, niet hoog genoeg is, of als je ze niet lang genoeg neemt, zullen bacterin die er resistent tegen zijn zich verder verspreiden. It has been observed that over time Mareks disease virus has become more virulent, and this has been attributed classically to a leaky vaccine effect. Your membership is the foundation of our sustainability and resilience. Er zijn genoeg mensen die mij in mijn betoog steunen. De tekst is beschikbaar onder de licentie. Dr. Vanden Bossche is using an eerily similar argument about COVID-19 vaccines and SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, to the one used by Wakefield about MMR vaccine and measles. Also, as I said at the time, while it is possible that the B. pertussis bacteria is developing resistance to the vaccine through natural selection, the evidence that it is doing so struck me as weak and preliminary, just as the evidence claiming that SARS-CoV-2 is evolving to be resistant to current vaccines strikes me as weak and preliminary. NK cells are part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike [sic] natural Abs, they are capable of recognizing and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum of pathogenic agents. They do not. He does apparently have some history working on vaccines. The resulting type of immune response is unprecedented and licenses the host immune system to readily eliminate infection or to cure disease across a broad range of unrelated pathogens and/ or mammalian species. But, he said, Vanden Bossche's arguments "take a little bit of truth and then add a whole lot of misrepresentation.". This is not all that impressive, given that Snopes could only identify two patent applications in Vanden Bossche's name both for "immunologic formulations" and both of these patents, records indicate, had their "applications terminated before publication.". Geert Vanden Bossche is een Belgische dierenarts[1], viroloog[1], zelfverklaard mRNA-vaccinatie specialist en onafhankelijk onderzoeker en adviseur op het gebied van vaccins. However, even if this phenomenon occurs with a human vaccineit doesnt, as far as we knowthats an even more compelling reason to be vaccinated. Snoeck noemt het onomwonden technische nonsens die voor een niet-wetenschapper moeilijk te doorprikken zijn. Dr Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine The mechanism he invokes is that vaccine-produced antibodies will "outcompete" the more general defenses of the innate immune system. ), lets just review what Wakefield claimed about the MMR vaccine back in 2019. mRNA-vaccins werden al volop ontwikkeld vr COVID-19 uitbrak (En coronavaccins zoals Pfizer en Moderna maken gebruik van messenger-RNA dat in de cellen van de mens eiwitten aanmaakt van virusuitsteeksels, red.). Vanden Bossche has been able to avoid allegations of peddling such a cure at least in the credulous anti-vaccine community because his resume legitimately includes stints at companies or initiatives involved in vaccine development, including The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Ze vindt wereldwijd slechts twee onderzoeken naar een NK-vaccin tegen COVID-19, die bovendien allebei nog niet van start zijn gegaan. De standpunten vermeld in deze community reflecteren niet noodzakelijk de redactionele lijn van DeWereldMorgen.be. Je kan gerust zon idee als het NK-vaccin voorstellen, vindt Leroux-Roels, Maar het lijkt me beter om in een epidemie te werken met een benadering waarvan we weten dat ze veilig is en op korte termijn werkt. Wat beweert hij nu precies en wat is er van aan? Zo lijkt uit deze reactie dat Vanden Bossche een interview had met VRT terwijl die vermeld hadden dat ze Vanden Bossche hadden gecontacteerd maar dat hij niet wenste reageren. Basically, its a race against evolution to get as many people as possible vaccinated before the virus can evolve resistance to the vaccine, and were fortunate that, contrary to Bossches claim, SARs-CoV-2 does not mutate very fast for an RNA virus. Hij wordt op YouTube voorgesteld als een wereldwijde vaccinautoriteit met een grote reputatie, maar dat klopt niet. Nog meer mensen laten sterven?. Geert Vanden Bossche is a scientist who published an open letter warning of global catastrophe due to deadly variants of COVID-19 selected for by mass vaccination. In any case, I got a particularly strong brave maverick vibe from this passage: While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Of course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different from conventional vaccines in that theyre not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B and T cells, but NK cells. GEERT VANDEN BOSSCHE: 'MY FINAL CALL' The Highwire with Del Bigtree News Lockdowns Expand in China; Details of New 'Disinformation Czar'; New #PfizerDocuments Released; Geert Vanden Bossche's Final, Dire Warning to the World Guest: Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD #VandenBossche #GVBFinalCall Episode Website More Episodes Geert Vanden Bossche Contribute to IMDb. (I kid you not.) There are 10+ professionals named "Geert Van Den Bossche", who use LinkedIn to exchange information, ideas, and opportunities.